StockMarket Cycles StockMarket Cycles
Plans & Pricing

Commentary timeline

Comments (4)

We welcome all comments related to market timing. We do not welcome political and insulting comments, however, and comments of a political nature belong elsewhere and could lead to removal and blocking the originator of such political comments.

You cannot post comments.
Sign up for Market Commentary or Bundle membership, or log in if you are already a member.

nouseforaname
nouseforaname

Peter Eliades’ trendline analysis, with its reliance on geometric patterns and time-based Fibonacci retracements, is more theoretical spectacle than practical strategy. It suffers from overfitting, lacks empirical validation, and consistently fails to deliver actionable signals in real-world markets. In the end, it’s a system built more on visual appeal than on statistical substance — elegant in hindsight, unreliable in practice. Simply said: Utter nosense for a future projection!

daniel039209
daniel039209

c.toenges5349 said:

Peter Eliades’ trendline analysis, with its reliance on geometric patterns and time-based Fibonacci retracements, is more theoretical spectacle than practical strategy. It suffers from overfitting, lacks empirical validation, and consistently fails to deliver actionable signals in real-world markets. In the end, it’s a system built more on visual appeal than on statistical substance — elegant in hindsight, unreliable in practice. Simply said: Utter nosense for a future projection!

That reads like an AI response!? True though, as there is NO actionable signals. Showed getting a cross down/sell within .50 cents of low,(very late, unactioinable) only to get a crossup buy 30 mins later....?

XXSPOWER127
XXSPOWER127

c.toenges5349 said:

Peter Eliades’ trendline analysis, with its reliance on geometric patterns and time-based Fibonacci retracements, is more theoretical spectacle than practical strategy. It suffers from overfitting, lacks empirical validation, and consistently fails to deliver actionable signals in real-world markets. In the end, it’s a system built more on visual appeal than on statistical substance — elegant in hindsight, unreliable in practice. Simply said: Utter nosense for a future projection!

Chat GPT Anyone?

LMAO

daniel039209
daniel039209

"much too early to make a judgement with any confidence" about this being a top ? But, you have been doing JUST THAT for , hard to say how long. late 2022, late 2023 , most of 2024? most of 2025? NOW, you are NOT so confident? intellectual honesty, or a point of action, not potential 13,100 days apart points in time

1–4 of 4